Software Associates India

Software Associates Bengaluru

Comparison of RTLS technologies for indoor location tracking.

Comparison of RTLS technologies

Here’s a comparison of RTLS technologies and their pros and cons: There are three main affordable RTLS (Real-Time Location System) technologies: WiFi, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), and Ultra-Wideband (UWB).



  • Wide range: WiFi signals can travel through walls, making them suitable for large indoor and outdoor spaces.
  • Existing infrastructure: Many buildings already have WiFi , so deploying WiFi RTLS can be relatively easy
  • Mature technology: WiFi is a well-established technology with a wide range of available tags.


  • Lower accuracy: WiFi RTLS has an accuracy of 1-5 meters, which may not be sufficient for some applications.
  • Multipath interference: WiFi signals can bounce off walls and other objects, which can lead to inaccurate location readings, especially when there are partitions in the warehouse.
  • Higher power consumption: WiFi tags can drain batteries more quickly than BLE or UWB tags; hence there is a cost associated with maintaining them.

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)


  • Lower power consumption: BLE tags can last for months or even years on a single battery.
  • Good for indoors: BLE signals have a shorter range than WiFi, but they penetrate walls and obstacles better, making them a good choice for indoor applications.
  • Lower cost: BLE tags and readers are typically less expensive than WiFi or UWB.


  • Shorter range: BLE typically has a range of 10-30 meters, which may not be sufficient for some applications, however mesh networks such as Wirepas enable long-range tracking
  • Limited scalability: BLE can struggle to track a large number of tags in a dense environment. A mesh network helps in scalability to support a large number of tags.
  • Lower accuracy: BLE RTLS has an accuracy of 3-5 meters, which may not be sufficient for some applications.

Ultra-Wideband (UWB)


  • High accuracy: UWB can achieve accuracy down to centimeters, making it ideal for applications that require precise location tracking.
  • Good for multipath environments: UWB is less susceptible to multipath interference than WiFi or BLE.
  • Secure: UWB signals are difficult to jam or spoof, making them a good choice for security applications.


  • Higher cost: UWB tags and readers are the most expensive of the three technologies.
  • Shorter range: UWB typically has a range of 10-50 meters, which may not be sufficient for some applications.
  • Limited availability: UWB is a relatively new technology, and there are fewer tags and readers available than WiFi or BLE.

Ultimately, the comparison of RTLS technologies for you will depend on your specific needs and budget. If you need high accuracy and security, UWB is the best option. If you need a low-cost solution for indoor tracking, BLE mesh RTLS infrastructure is a good choice. And if you need to track assets in a large outdoor space, WiFi may be the best option.